Occasionally I hear this talk thrown around how "if you want fiber in a remote location, pay for it yourself".
Okay, let's say we do that. I pay CenturyLink to run miles of fiber to their remote terminal and to me.
But meanwhile now CenturyLink can use "my" fiber to upgrade service for everyone else along the fiber route. Why the hell should CL now be able to profit from selling upgraded service to these other people, using "my" fiber?
If I pay for it, even if they're doing the install work, I should get reimbursed monthly by CenturyLink for them using "my" fiber that they refused to install themselves to expand their customer base.
--
CenturyLink remote pedestal: RUBY, 10 miles west of Gilman, WI
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20533172-Rural-Century-Telephone-remote-terminal-unit
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20530745-Name-of-this-polemount-outdoor-telco-canister
↧